The Seventh International Conference on Travel Survey Methods was held at the Los Suenos Marriott hotel, Playa Herradura in Costa Rica from August 1 to 6,2004. In common with previous conferences in this series, this was a working conference. The conference was organised by the International Steering Committee for Travel Survey Conferences, jointly chaired by Dr. Cheryl Stecher (USA) and Professor Peter Stopher (Australia). Local arrangements were handled by a Local Organising Committee, jointly chaired by Carlos Arce (USA) and Carlos Contreras (Costa Rica). About 80 delegates attended, representing 19 countries from North, Central, and South America, Europe, Africa, Australasia, and the Middle East.
Conference participants were assigned to two workshops, one of which met in the first part of the conference and the other in the second part. There were eight workshops in the first half of the conference and seven in the second half. Each workshop was given a specific topic and a charge. Resource papers were commissioned for each workshop, and these resource papers formed the foundation of the deliberations of the workshop. In addition, 21 papers, written in response to a call for papers, were presented in workshops during the conference.
The conference commenced on Sunday evening with a welcome reception, and opening remarks from the Costa Rican Ministry of Transport and Public Works. On Monday morning, a plenary session was held with three keynote papers. The first of these summarised the state of Travel Surveys in Latin America, and was presented by Juan de Dios Ortuzar. This was followed by a paper on Travel Surveys in Europe, presented by Henk van Evert, after which a paper on standards for household travel surveys was presented by Peter Stopher. Following this opening plenary session, a second plenary session was held in which participants heard from eight commissioned paper authors, each of whom had been commissioned to write a resource paper for a specific workshop. The workshops and their resource paper authors and chairs for the first half of the conference were as follows:
Workshop A1: Survey Design
Chair: David Kurth (USA)
Resource Paper Authors: Henk van Evert (Netherlands), Werner Brög (Germany), Erhard ErI (Germany)
Travel survey designs vary considerably around the world. While the United States gravitated toward telephone interviews in the 1970s, home interviews have remained popular elsewhere, and are, in certain countries, the dominant mode of travel survey. Telephone surveys are beleaguered by low response rates, caller ID, telephone answering machines, and ‘no call’ lists. At the same time, home interviews have become increasingly expensive in most countries and the issue of security remains a deterrent to their use. The time appears ripe, therefore, to review survey designs as used around the world and in the light of current trends, good practice, and new technology, identify survey procedures that promise to improve current practice. Within each mode attention should be given to effective means of recruitment, motivation of respondents, effective communication among participants, efficient data acquisition, and establishing means of quality control and error correction wherever possible.
Workshop A2: Sample Design
Chair: Rosella Picardo (USA)
Resource Paper Author: Mira Paskota (Serbia)
Sample design requires information on the variance in the data, levels of error in the data that would be acceptable to the user, and the certainty the user needs to know whether errors in the data are within the acceptable limits or not. Variance within the data is not known in advance of the survey and, therefore, one area of discussion is whether establishment of typical (or default) variances of data items would be worthwhile and useful. Another issue is what variables should be considered in establishing sample size and how should the sample sizes needed for each variable be combined to establish a common sample size. Acceptable error limits on individual variable have typically been established subjectively and yet this has been done without knowing how input errors propagate through the travel demand modelling process to model outputs. Are errors in input variables that are typically considered acceptable (say, d”10%) producing output errors that are within acceptable limits? Is there a need for sensitivity analysis to study this effect? Lastly, is there a need for a standardised procedure for establishing sample sizes in travel surveys?
Workshop A3: Instrument Design
Chair: Tom Cohen (UK)
Resource Paper Author: Johanna Zmud (USA)
Since survey instruments, and the manner in which they are used, may vary from one part of the world to the other, aspects of instrument design that are significant may vary. Issues that formed the subject of discussion included guidelines on good practice in the design of a self-administered questionnaire (e.g. layout, font, colour, etc.) or the structure and content of a telephone-administered survey, the desirability of identifying a core set of questions to be included in all travel surveys, the value of establishing standard wording for some questions, standardization of categories on items such as education level, job classification, or income, and whether there is a desirable ordering of questions in a survey. These issues need to be discussed in the context of different international settings.